RAM SUMIRAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPTT.LKO. and ORS.
WRIA/23973/2017 · 2025-11-27
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172871 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172871 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 23973 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Saurabh Lavania Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Ram Sumiran .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Rural Development Deptt.Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench