Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17287 (RAJ)

VISHAMBHAR DAYAL SHARMA S/O SOHANLAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/5731/2025 · 2025-06-06

Mukesh Rajpurohit V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:22945] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5731/2025 Vishambhar Dayal Sharma S/o Sohanlal Sharma, R/o Joshi Mohalla Nabhawala, P.S. Andhi, District Jaipur Rural. At Present 38, Brijvila Krishna Nagar T.t. Friend Colony, Lalkothi, Jaipur. (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Sharma for Mr. Gaurav Rathore For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP Mr. Amit Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.) Order 06/06/2025 1. This bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No.283/2023 registered at Police Station Mojmabad, Jaipur Rural for the offence(s) under Sections 420, 406 and 120-B IPC. 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner submits petitioner is 72 years old and has falsely been implicated in this case. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.04.2025 and conclusion of the trial will take considerable time. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has opposed the bail application. 4. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the present case, and perused the record as also arguments advanced [2025:RJ-JP:22945] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5731/2025] by learned counsel for both the parties, since petitioner is in judicial custody since 11.04.2025 and conclusion of trial will take time, without commenting on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Therefore, this bail application is allowed and accused- petitioner namely Vishambhar Dayal Sharma S/o Sohanlal Sharma is ordered to be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the petitioner shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. However, it is made clear that the petitioner shall not involve in similar offence(s) during currency of the bail granted by this court. The petitioner is further directed to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station in the 1st week of every month, till trial is concluded. If breach of any of these conditions, is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the Trial Court to cancel the bail granted to petitioner by this Court. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT (V. J.)),J HEENA/67