SANTOSH KUMAR PAL and ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE SECY. OF BASIC EDUCATION and ORS.
WRIA/5985/2017 · 2025-10-30
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172860 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 5985 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioners to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. October 30, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vinay Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C, P.K. Singh Bisen (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Santosh Kumar Pal And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Secy. Of Basic Education And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench