Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172850 (ALL)

AMAR YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.

BAIL/11273/2025 · 2025-11-21

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11273 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Uma, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.119 of 2025, under Sections 140(3), 352, 351(2) B.N.S, P.S. Badosarain, District- Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR through an application under Section 173(4) B.N.S.S, it was alleged that the elder daughter-in-law of the informant was enticed away along with some jewellery and some cash and threats were being received on the telephone. It was also apprehended that the daughter-in-law has been killed. 4. The contention of learned counsel for the applicant is that no specific allegations were levelled against the applicant. He further argues that one of the co-accused Maniram Pal is related to Anjani Kumar Pal. The applicant is in custody since 29.08.2025, having no previous criminal antecedent, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail. 5. Learned A.G.A has opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the material on record as also the delay in lodging the F.I.R i.e. more than a month, there being nothing specific against the applicant; as also the fact that the applicant is in jail since 29.08.2025 having no criminal antecedents, therefore, without entering into the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant Amar Yadav be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pintoo Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amar Yadav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 21, 2025 DiVYa BAIL No. 11273 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- DIVYA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench