ARAFEEN BEG v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
/9646/2025 · 2025-12-02
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172847 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9646 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present application is filed with the prayer to quash the charge sheet dated 11.4.2012 as well as entire proceeding of Crimnal Case No.1621 of 2021, arising out of Case Crime No.3070 of 2010, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 I.P.C. and Section 3/7 E.C. Act, Police Station Kotwali Sadar, District Lakhimpur Kheri.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant was falsely implicated in the present case and charge sheet was submitted but he was not aware about the pendency of the trial of the case in question. Thereafter without service of summons, non- bailable warrant thereafter proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. has been issued by the learned lower court below therefore, kind indulgence of this Court is necessary.
4. Learned AGA vehemently opposed the prayer of applicant and submitted that charge sheet is of dated 11.4.2012 and the applicant is not cooperating in the proceeding therefore, no interference is required.
5. Considering the submissions of learned counsel for the parties, and going through the contents of petition, as the record reveals that charge sheet is dated 11.4.2012 but the applicant was not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rama Kant Dixit Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Arafeen Beg .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
cooperating therefore, proceeding non bailable warrant was issued and later on proceedings of 82 Cr.P.C. was also issued therefore, this Court is of the view that the petition is misconceived and is accordingly, dismissed.
6. However, it is open for the applicant to appear before the court concerned and apply for bail. In case, the same is applied, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386). December 2, 2025/Pks A482 No. 9646 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- POOJA SETH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench