SMT. URMILA DEVI AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO AND ANOTHER
/10272/2025 · 2025-12-04
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172843 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172843 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10272 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant(s), learned A.G.A. for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Harish Kumar, learned counsel, who has filed power on behalf of opposite party no.2, which is taken on record. 2. The present application has been filed seeking quashing of the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.2390 of 2023, State Vs. Urmila Devi and another, arising out of Case Crime No.644 of 2022, under Sections 419 and 420 IPC, Police Station Kheri, District Kheri and the order dated 10.11.2023 passed by the Civil Judge (SD)/FTC/Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for both the parties submit that parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by way of compromise and the original compromise deed dated 21.11.2025 has been annexed as Annexure-6 to the application, therefore, the aforesaid case may be decided in terms of the compromise arrived at between the parties. 4. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court, as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties before the court concerned. 5. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of with a direction to both the parties to appear before the court concerned on 12.12.2025 and file their comprise application. If such compromise application is filed, Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Smt. Urmila Devi And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
the court concerned shall issue notices to all the signatories to the compromise requiring their personal presence and, thereafter, proceed to verify the compromise within six weeks from that date. If the aforesaid compromise is verified, a report to that effect shall be prepared by the court making compromise to be part of the record and a report to that effect shall also be send to this Court whether the said compromise took place or not. The court concerned will allow the parties to obtain certified copy of the report as well as compromise. It will also be open to the applicant to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. 6.
For a period of three months, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 7 Office is directed to return the original compromise deed to the counsel for the applicant(s) after retaining a photocopy of the same on record. December 4, 2025 Rao/- A482 No. 10272 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench