Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17284 (GAU)

KHADIZA KHATUN v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS

WP(C)/4654/2023 · 2025-08-11

Kaushik Goswami

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010175072023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4654/2023 KHADIZA KHATUN W/O- LATE SAIDUR RAHMAN, RESIDENT OF VILL AND P.O. KRISHNAPUR, P.S. SILCHAR, DIST.- CACHAR, (ASSAM) VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS TO BE REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PENSION AND PUBLIC GRIEVANCES DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI- 781006 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 3:THE COMMISISONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM HOME DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 4:THE DIRECTOR OF PENSION HOUSE-FED COMPLEX DISPUR GUWAHATI- 781006 5:THE MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA SILCHAR MAIN BRANCH SILCHAR Page No.# 2/3 P.O.- SILCHAR AND DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM 6:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA ARUNACHAL PRADESH CACHAR P.O. SILCHAR AND DIST.- CACHAR ASSAM 7:THE TREASURY OFFICER SILCHAR P.O. SILCHAR AND DIST.- CACHAR ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR F A LASKAR, MR. D H MOZUMDER Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, MR U SARMA (R-5,6),MR. N BARUA (R-5,6),GA, ASSAM,SC, TREASURY BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 12.08.2025 Heard Mr. N. H. Borbhuyan , learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. F. A. Laskar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. N. Barua, learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 ; Mr. R. Dhar, learned Additional Senior Government Advocate appearing for the state respondent and Mr. M. Bhuyan, learned standing counsel appearing for the Finance Department. Mr. N. H. Borbhuyan, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the petitioner expired. He further submits that only surviving son has instructed that Page No.# 3/3 he is not interested to be substituted in place of the petitioner. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition stands abated and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant