Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172832 (ALL)

RAHUL MAURYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO

BAIL/7331/2024 · 2025-12-11

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7331 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No. 31 of 2024, under sections 302 IPC, Sections 3/25 Arms Act, P.S. Haidergarh, District Barabanki. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that husband of informant used to work for sale and purchase of animals and a dispute had occurred in between husband of informant and one Shailendra with respect to payment of money for which threats were issued and the day before incident when husband of informant did not come back an information was received that her husband has been killed. It was apprehended that the applicant and the co accused had committed the offence in question. The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that during trial the testimony of the informant as well as the prosecution witness no. 2 has been recorded wherein they have specifically stated that they had not seen the incident in question. Recovery of weapon assigned to the applicant is from an independent place and is not in presence of independent witness. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Anil Kumar Yadav, Achal Singh Yadav, Akshay Singh, Apoorva Jyoti, Ashok Kumar Khare, Devanshu Pratap Singh, Neeraj Kumar Rawat, Pradeep Kumar Yadav, Sanat Singh, Shrvan Singh, Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rahul Maurya .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. The Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that five fact witness have been examined and they have not directly implicated the applicant, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 27.1.2024 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Rahul Maurya be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. December 11, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 7331 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench