PRAMOD TIWARI v. EXCISE COMMISSIONER STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPMS/2529/2023 · 2025-11-19
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17283 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17283 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:10245 SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r ep or t s, or d er s or p r oceed in g s or d ir ect ion s an d Reg ist r ar ’s or d er w it h Sig n at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
W PMS 2 5 2 9 / 2 0 2 3
Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.
Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate, i/ b Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State.
(2) Learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous.
(3) In view of the statement made, writ petition is dism issed as infructuous.
( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.)
1 9 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.11.19 17:10:34 +05'30'
2025:UHC:10245