Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17283 (UTT)

PRAMOD TIWARI v. EXCISE COMMISSIONER STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/2529/2023 · 2025-11-19

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:10245 SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r ep or t s, or d er s or p r oceed in g s or d ir ect ion s an d Reg ist r ar ’s or d er w it h Sig n at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS W PMS 2 5 2 9 / 2 0 2 3 Hon ’ble Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J. Ms. Ruchika Negi, Advocate, i/ b Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel, for the State. (2) Learned Counsel for the petitioner makes a statement at the bar that writ petition has become infructuous. (3) In view of the statement made, writ petition is dism issed as infructuous. ( Man oj Ku m ar Tiw ar i, J.) 1 9 .1 1 .2 0 2 5 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2025.11.19 17:10:34 +05'30' 2025:UHC:10245