Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17283 (AP)

KAKARA VEERABABU @ VEERA BHADRARAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/4956/2025 · 2025-05-08

T Mallikarjuna Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

/s IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAV>9«ft FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO •V^ ft :3 ,c \vO // /} CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4956 OF 2025 Between: KAKARA VEERABABU @ VEERA BHADRARAO, S/0 Ganagaraju @ Gangarao, Hindu, Aged 45 Years, R/0 Rajanagaram Village, RajanagaramMandalam ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED A-2 AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep., by its Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh, At Amaravathi. ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS Petition under Section 482 of BNSS, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Anticipatory bail to the petitioner, directing the arresting officer to release him on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with FIR No. 458/2024 of Prohibition & Excise Station, Rajamahendravaram- South. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri B PARAMESEWARA RAO, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor of High Court of Andhra Pradesh on behalf of the Respondent. The Court made the following: - ♦ APHC010234942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] FRIDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 4956/2n?f^ Between: Kakara Veerababu @ Veera Bhadrarao AND ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT The State Of Andhra Pradesh Counsel for the Petitioner/accused' 1.B PARAMESEWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant' 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ORDER: This Criminal Petition, u/Sec.482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioner/A2 in Crime No.458 Rajamahendravaram South. seeking anticipatory bail, and Excise Station, of 2024 of Prohibition 2. A case has been registered against the petitioner/A2 the offence punishable u/Sec.7-B r/w 8-B of A.P. and another for Prohibition (Amendment) Act. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State. 4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that, on 04.11.2024 at 08.30 on receipt of reliable information, regarding illegal sales of ID liquor Assistant am in the % 2 Narendrapuram Village, the S.l of Police, along with staff and mediators, .ushed to the scene of offence, and found one female person standing w,th a mica bag placed near her feet. On seeing the raid party, the said person but the S.l of Police apprehended her. On verification, they tried to escape found 20 liters of ID liquor packed in four polythene covers liters of ID liquor (04x05=20 liters). On questioning, she revealed her identity Venkatalakshmi (A1) and each contains 5 confessed that she purchased the ID as Vanum liquor from Kakara seized the ID liquor Heard. Perused the record. Veerababu (A2) at a lower price. Police arrested her and remanded her to judicial custody. 5. submits that major part of the sheet for want of RFSL He further submitted that three 5. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor investigation is completed except filing of charge to dismiss the petition report and prays antecedents are reported against the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner is aged 7. of his entire family and if he was to allow the and he is the bread earner will be put to starvation and prays about 45 years arrested, his entire family criminal petition. The case against the petitioner isis based on the confession statement of A1. The record shows confession statement. But as Prosecutor that the petitioner inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner/A2 at this stage is based on the the learned Assistant Public this Court is not that the case against the petitioner submitted by has three antecedents 8. r- • % 3 9. In the result, the Criminal Petition iIS dismissed. Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. Officer-in-Charge Rajamahendravaram- South, East Godavari District. One CC to SRI B PARAMESEWARA RAO Two GO’S to The Public Prosecutor [OUT] Three CD Copies Prohibition & Excise Police Station 2. Advocate [OPUC] of High Court of Andhra Pradesh 3. 4. GPC HIGH COURT GPC DATED: 09/05/2025 ORDER CRLP.No.4956 of 2025 DISMISSING THIS CRLP