( 2025:JHHC:20592 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1890 of 2024 ------ Rajesh Ranjan Kumar @ Rajesh Kumar Ranjan, aged about 47 years, son of Late Rajendra Prasad, Resident of Dr. Kishori Mohan Complex, Road No.4, House No.85, P.O. and P.S.-Rampur, Dist.- Gaya/Bihar. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Rani Devi, daughter of Ramchandra Prasad and wife of Rajesh Kumar Ranjan, resident of village Sai Mohalla Garhwa, P.O. and P.S.-Garhwa, Dist.-Garhwa/Jharkhand. .... .... .... Respondents ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Naveen Kr. Jaiswal, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kr. Mishra, Advocate For the OP 2 : Mr. Gopal K. Sinha, Advocate : Mrs. Priyanka Bobby, Advocate ------ Order No.10 Dated- 25/07/2025 Heard the parties. This Cr.M.P has been filed with a prayer to modify the order dated 22.02.2019 passed in A.B.A. No.2144 of 2018 whereby and whereunder the petitioner was given the privilege of anticipatory bail inter alia with the condition that the petitioner will continue to pay monthly ad-interim victim compensation of Rs.6,000/- per month and must file the proof of deposit of said amount each month in the account of the opposite party no.2 by way of demand draft. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is still on bail in terms of the order dated 22.02.2019 passed in A.B.A. No.2144 of 2018. It is next submitted that in the month of May, 2021, the petitioner was admitted in hospital for sudden loss of consciousness and some other related problems and from that day, the petitioner is suffering from various ailments and is disabled to the extent of 60% and is suffering from paralysis, in the right side of body, hence, he is unable to walk, speak or do anything, hence, he is not having any earning. It is therefore, submitted that the petitioner is unable to abide by the condition of payment of Rs.6,000/- per month and it is next submitted that taking advantage of the said order, the opposite party no.2 is also deliberately delaying the disposal of the Garhwa P.S. Case No.174 of 2017, hence, it is submitted that the prayer as prayed for, in this Cr.M.P., be allowed. Learned counsel appearing for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 do not dispute that the petitioner is suffering from 60% disability because of paralytic attack on the right side of his body by which he is unable to walk, speak or do anything. Considering the changed circumstances, the order dated 22.02.2019 passed in A.B.A. No.2144 of 2018 is modified by deleting the condition of paying monthly ad-interim victim compensation of Rs.6,000/- per month to the opposite party no.2. Accordingly, the order dated 22.02.2019 passed in A.B.A. No.2144 of 2018 is modified to the aforesaid extent. Accordingly, this Cr.M.P. is allowed to the aforesaid extent. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/