Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17281 (HP)

BABU RAM AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/11628/2025 · 2025-07-30

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA CWP No.11628 of 2025 Decided on: 30.07.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Babu Ram and Ors ....Petitioners Versus State of H.P. & Ors. …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Naveen Kumar, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. Petitioners claim relief on the strength of law laid down in in Ranjit Singh & Ors Vs. State of H.P. and Ors2. It is, however, seen from the record that they have not filed representation in this regard. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 CWP No. 2500 of 2021, decided on 07.07.2023 - 2 - Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners would be content, in case, they are permitted to submit representation(s) to the respondents/ Competent Authority seeking the relief prayed for by them in the writ petition, whereafter, respondents /Competent Authority, be directed to decide the representation(s) to be made by them, in a time bound manner. Learned Additional Advocate General has no objection to this prayer. 4. In view of above submissions, the present petition is disposed of by permitting the petitioners to make comprehensive representation(s) to the respondents /Competent Authority, within a period of two weeks from today, who shall in turn, consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, in light of aforesaid decision, within a further period of six weeks by passing order, which shall also be communicated to the petitioners. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge July 30, 2025 R.Atal