OM SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/8955/2025 · 2025-11-13
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8955 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.390 of 2024, under sections 498A, 304B IPC and sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Kamalpur, District Sitapur.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the co accused mother in law and father in law have been enlarged on bail. The applicant is the husband. Considering the fact that the FIR was lodged through an applicant under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and there is no post mortem report done, the material to indicate unnatural death is apparently missing.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 28.4.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Om Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vandana Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Vimlesh Kumar Kashyap Om Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. November 13, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8955 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench