SRI Manikyamba Sahitha Sri Bhimeswaraswami vari Kalyana Mandapam Development Committee v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/10454/2019 · 2025-08-10
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17280 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17280 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010235502019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: Between:
1. SRI Manikyamba Sahitha Sri Bhimeswaraswami vari Kalyana Mandapam Development Committee, 2 Godavari District Rep. by its Vice President Undru Subba Rao
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Dept, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
2. The District Collector, Zilla Parishad Wing East Godavari District, Kakinada
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram District
4. Tahsildar, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Uppalaguptam, East Godavari District
5. Gram Panchayat, Gollavilli Village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interferi the possession and enjoyment of the Kalyana Mandapam constructed by the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE ELEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10454 OF 2019
1. SRI Manikyamba Sahitha Sri Bhimeswaraswami vari Kalyana Mandapam Development Committee, 2-283, Gollavilli village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District Rep. by its Vice President Undru Subba Rao ...Petitioner AND f Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat and Rural Development Dept, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District
2. The District Collector, Zilla Parishad Wing East Godavari District, Kakinada
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Amalapuram Division, East Godavari
4. Tahsildar, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Uppalaguptam, East Godavari District
5. Gram Panchayat, Gollavilli Village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interferi the possession and enjoyment of the Kalyana Mandapam constructed by the IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
1. SRI Manikyamba Sahitha Sri Bhimeswaraswami vari Kalyana Mandapam 283, Gollavilli village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East ...Petitioner f Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat and
2. The District Collector, Zilla Parishad Wing East Godavari District, Kakinada Division, East Godavari
4.
Tahsildar, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Uppalaguptam, East Godavari District
5.
SRI Manikyamba Sahitha Sri Bhimeswaraswami vari Kalyana Mandapam 283, Gollavilli village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East ...Petitioner f Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat and
2. The District Collector, Zilla Parishad Wing East Godavari District, Kakinada Division, East Godavari
4. Tahsildar, Uppalaguptam Mandal, Uppalaguptam, East Godavari District
5. Gram Panchayat, Gollavilli Village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari ...Respondents India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the Kalyana Mandapam constructed by the
petitioner bearing Door No.2-86 in an extent of 0.23 cents in Sy.No.58/1 of Gollavilli Village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District without recourse to law as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently directing the Respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the said building in any respect IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere/meddle with the possession and enjoyment of the Kalyana Mandapam constructed by the petitioner bearing Door No.2-86 in an extent of 0.23 cents in Sy.No.58/1 of Gollavilli Village, Uppalaguptam Mandal, East Godavari District including dispossession of the petitioner from the said property and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim order granted on 01.08.2019 in WP No.10454 of 2019 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order granted on 01-08-2019 in W.P.No.10454 of 2019 and dismiss the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: T V S PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV (AP) The Court made the following order:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 10454 OF 2019 ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. The learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause of action does not survive since the respondents are not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner’s land and, therefore, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 3. Permission, as sought, is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, granting liberty to the petitioner to institute fresh proceedings as and when cause of action arises. There shall be no order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 11.08.2025 KKV
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION NO.10454 of 2019
11.08.2025 KKV