Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172790 (ALL)

SMT. NEELAM PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P.THRU.PRIN.SECY. BASIC EDUCATION and ORS.

WRIA/10266/2021 · 2025-11-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 10266 of 2021 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Ms. Kajol, Advocate, holding brief of Sri Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition has become infructuous and it may be dismissed as having become infructuous. In view of the aforesaid statement of learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Consigned to records. November 27, 2025 AKS Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dhananjai Kumar Tripathi, Shiv Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Anand Mani Tripathi, Ghaus Beg, Kumar Ayush (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Smt. Neelam Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Prin.Secy. Basic Education And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench