Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17278 (GAU)

MD RAMJAN ALI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./2581/2025 · 2025-08-19

Pranjal Das

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010175312025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./2581/2025 MD RAMJAN ALI S/O MONUWAR HUSSAIN R/O VILL- KABAITARI PT.IV P.S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM TO BE REP. BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A WAHAB, U U KHAN,MR. A AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS ORDER 20.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. A. Wahab, learned counsel for the accused petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. P.P., Assam appearing. 2. This petition under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 has been filed by the accused-petitioner, namely, Md. Ramjan Ali, has prayed for grant of bail in Page No.# 2/3 connection with Palashbari Case No.186/2025 registered under Sections 305 of BNS, 2023. 3. The gist of allegation in this case is about theft of a vehicle bearing registration No. AS01CC4692 loaded with dairy products worth about rupees nine lakhs. The incident is alleged to have taken place around mid night of 23.07.2025. 4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 27.07.2025. It is further submitted that as the vehicle has already been recovered and it is the accused who informed the owner of the vehicle about the development. 4. On the other hand, Mr. D. P. Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor, on the basis of the receipt of the case diary submits that though investigation has not yet been completed but truck and the materials contained therein have been recovered. It is also submitted that investigation has leveled some incriminating materials against the present accused as well, who is prima facie stated to be involved in purchasing some stolen vehicle and selling them in scrap. 5. In the circumstances, considering the length of detention, the recovery and progress of investigation, the accused can be enlarged on bail at this stage. 6. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- with one suitable surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned concerned court. The direction for bail is further subject to the conditions that the petitioner: (a) shall co-operate with remaining investigation; (b) shall not in any manner cause any harm or harassment to the informant Page No.# 3/3 side. (c) shall not in any manner hamper or tamper with evidence. 7. Violation of any of the conditions shall entail cancellation of bail. 8. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed and disposed of on the aforesaid terms. JUDGE Comparing Assistant