MANCHAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9165/2025 · 2025-10-31
Rajeev Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172778 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172778 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9165 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record.
2. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicants for quashing of the chargesheet No. 01, dated 13/08/2024 filed by the investigating authority, Order of cognizance dated 11/12/2024 taken over the police report and summoning order dated 11/12/2024 issued by the Learned Add. Civil Judge (J.D.)/ Judicial Magistrate Court No.11, Dist- Gonda against the applicants/petitioners as well as entire criminal proceedings arising out of the FIR No. 146 of 2024, under section-323,504,506,308 I.P.C, Police station- Motiganj, District which is at present pending before the court of Learned Add. Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate Court No.11.
3. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicants submit that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicants may be permitted to move discharge application through counsel and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same.
4. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer.
5. In view of above, it is provided that applicants are permitted to move their discharge application(s) through counsel within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order.
6. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rohit Kumar Tripathi, Deepak Kumar, Divya Singh, Pooja Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Manchan And Another .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
applicants in the aforesaid case.
7. In case of failure on the part of applicants in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, they will not be entitled to the benefit of this order.
8. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. October 31, 2025 A.Nigam A482 No. 9165 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ NIGAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench