Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172764 (ALL)

AMIT SAROJ @ RAMRAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. HOME AND 3 OTHERS

/11868/2025 · 2025-11-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11868 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State; Shri Nishant Singh, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.213 of 2025, under Section 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) of BNS & Section 5/6 of POCSO Act, P.S. Naseerabad, District Raebareli. 3. In terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant aged about 16 years was enticed and it was apprehended that wrong was committed on her. In the statements under Section 180 & 183 BNSS, the victim disclosed her age as 19 years and stated that as she was being forced to marry elsewhere, the victim has married the applicant. Counsel for the applicant states that the applicant and the victim have married. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the aforesaid, the applicant who is in custody since 25.10.2025 and has no criminal antecedents, is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Amit Saroj @ Ramraj be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pravin Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Amit Saroj @ Ramraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Home And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In the event the statement of fact that the applicant has married the victim turns out to be false, it would be open for the complainant to file a bail cancellation application. November 28, 2025 nishant BAIL No. 11868 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench