- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15932 WP No. 6933 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 6933 OF 2024 (CS-EL/M) BETWEEN: SRI C K NARASIMHA MURTHY S/O KENCHHANMAIAH AGED 53 YEARS MEMBERS OF CHINNAKURCHI MILK PRODUCERS SAHAKARA SANGHA LTD, CHINNAKURCHI, K GOLLAHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE - 560 074 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. THIMMAPPA N., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES NO 146, 3RD FLOOR, 4TH DIVISION SAHAKARA SOUDHA, 8TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 003 2. THE RETURNING OFFICER CHINNAKURCHI MILK PRODUCERS SAHAKRA SANGHA LTD., CHINNAKURCHI, K GOLLAHALLI POST, KENGERI HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BENGALURU - 560 074 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1 AND R2) Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15932 WP No. 6933 of 2024 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 07.02.2024 PASSED BY R-2, (ANNEXURE-F) TO THE WP DIRECT TO RESPONDENTS TO DECLARE THE WINNERS BASED ON THE ELECTIONS HELD ON 06.02.2024 AS PER THE NOTICE DTD 26.01.2024 (ANNEXURE-C) AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ ORAL ORDER 1. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the following reliefs: "(a) Issue a writ of certiorari, by quashing the Order dated 07.02.2024 passed by Respondent No. 2, (ANNEXURE F) to the Writ Petition. (b) Issue a direction to Respondents to declare the winners based on the elections held on 06.02.2024 as per the Notice dated 26.01.2024 (ANNEXURE C). (c) To issue any other direction or order or writ as deemed just in the circumstances and the probabilities of the case and the same may kindly be considered in the interest of justice and equity." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15932 WP No. 6933 of 2024 2. Despite the order dated 14.03.2025, there is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner nor have office objections been complied with. It appears that petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE AMA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 16 CT: SG