HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 12554 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of opposite parties. 2. Petition has been filed challenging the show- cause notice dated 09.10.2025. 3. It has been submitted that earlier a complaint had been made against petitioner on 16.04.2024 with regard to appointment of petitioner on the post of Block Community Process Manager in which the complaint was found baseless. It is submitted that the same person has thereafter moved several complaints against petitioner with the recent complaint also having been made which forms the basis of the impugned show cause notice. 4. It is therefore submitted that petitioner cannot be permitted to be continuously harassed by disgruntled complainant. 5. Learned State counsel has been provided written instructions dated 31.10.2025, a copy of which is Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Awadhesh Kumar Pandey, Pramod Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Pramod Kumar Maurya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Medical Health And Family Welfare Lko. And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) taken on record and as per which, the earlier complaint levelled against petitioner pertained to obtaining appointment on the basis of forged certificates. Petitioner was exonerated in the said proceedings. It is submitted that thereafter no final order was passed on any other complaint and the complaint which forms the basis of impugned show cause notice is on a different aspect that petitioner does not have requisite qualifications for appointment on the post which he is holding. It is also submitted that petitioner has already submitted his reply to the show cause notice and a final decision shall be taken shortly. 6. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is thus established that the complaint which forms basis of impugned show cause notice has never been decided by any authority concerned earlier. The previous complaints against petitioner were not with regard to present complaint. 7. Since petitioner has already submitted a reply to the show cause notice and there is no challenge raised with regard to lack of jurisdiction, the concerned authority is directed to pass appropriate orders after affording opportunity of hearing to petitioner and to considering his reply expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before said authority. 8. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that for the past six months salary payment has not been paid to petitioner. The concerned authority shall also consider the said aspect within the same time frame and pass appropriate orders. In case petitioner is found entitled for the aforesaid WRIA No. 12554 of 2025 2 salary, the same shall be paid to him forthwith. 9. With the aforesaid observation, petition stands disposed of. November 3, 2025 Subodh/- WRIA No. 12554 of 2025 3 (Manish Mathur,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench