VIVEK VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
A482/9318/2025 · 2025-11-04
Tej Pratap Tiwari
Special Leave Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172734 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172734 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9318 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record. By means of the instant application, the applicant has prayed that this Court be pleased to direct the learned Court below not to insist the petitioner to file surety bond in each and every two cases and accept only two sureties in lieu of all the two cases. The learned counsel appearing for the applicant submits that it has become impossible for the applicant to submit surety in each of case in which he has been granted bail. He added that the applicant has been granted bail in two cases arising out of following Case Crime Numbers :- 1) Case Crime No. 329 of 2021, under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506 of the IPC, PS Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow. 2) Case Crime No. 77 of 2020, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 of the IPC, PS Krishna Nagar, District Lucknow. He next added that despite the Trial Court granted the bail, the applicant is still in jail and the applicant being poor person is unable to produce the sureties in each cases. It is further submitted by the learned counsel for the applicant that in similar circumstances, namely, in the case of Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Harish Chandra Yadav, Lalit Kumar Saxena Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vivek Verma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
[SLP (Crl.) No.8914-8915/2018] the Supreme Court vide order dated 29.10.2018 has permitted the petitioner to submit personal bonds and two sureties of heavy amount to hold good in all the cases. Considering the aforesaid fact, the petition is disposed off with a direction to the applicant to furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- and two sureties of the like amount in one case, which shall be treated to be valid in all other cases wherein the bail orders have been passed. November 4, 2025 Anurag A482 No. 9318 of 2025 2 (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench