ARUN AGARWAL v. COURT OF ADDL. DISTT. AND SESSION JUDGE COURT NO 9 LKO. AND ANOTHER
/6907/2025 · 2025-11-26
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172728 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172728 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6907 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J.
1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the very outset, submits that inadvertently the Court has been impleaded as the respondent No.1 which needless to be delated and consequential amendment is also required to be made in the pleadings. Accordingly, he prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh with correct particulars and pleadings.
2. In view of the aforesaid, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
3. In case, if the petitioner moves an application for return of certified copies, the office shall do the needful within three days. November 26, 2025 Rakesh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Shanker Asthana, Mukesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Arun Agarwal .....Petitioner(s) Court Of Addl. Distt. And Session Judge Court No 9 Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench