2025:UHC:11171 SL. No. Dat e Office Not es, r epor t s, or der s or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar ’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS BA2 No. 3 1 8 of 2 0 2 5 Hon 'ble Rak esh Th apliyal, J. 1. Mr. Deepak Petshali, learned counsel for the applicant. 2. Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General with Mr. Himanshu Sain, learned Brief Holder for the State. 3. This is the second bail application and first bail application was rejected on 20.02.2025. 4. Present applicant Raees, S/ o Kamruddin is praying for bail in relation to FIR dated 13.09.2024, bearing FIR No. 0788 of 2024, registered at P.S. Kotwali Manglaur, District Haridwar, wherein the present applicant with one Mehraj implicated for the offence punishable under Section 109(1) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 read with Section 25(1)(b) of Arms Act at Police Station Kotwali Manglore, District Haridwar. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated and the other co-accused is also the real brother. He submits that present applicant is languishing in jail since 23.09.2024 and the charge sheet has been filed on 06.11.2024 and up till date out of 15 prosecution witnesses only one prosecution witness has been examined. He submits that taking into consideration that the applicant is languishing in jail since 23.09.2024 and there is no need of custodial interrogation of the applicant, the applicant be released on bail . 6. On the other side, Mr. G.S. Sandhu, learned Addl. Advocate General for the State has not disputed this fact that the charge sheet has already been filed on 2025:UHC:11171 06.11.2024 and the present applicant is languishing in jail since 23.09.2024, however he submits that the applicant have the criminal history of two cases. 7. After hearing the arguments of the learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that the charge sheet has already been filed on 06.11.2024, and the present applicant is languishing in jail 23.09.2024, this Court is of the view that the present applicant deserves for bail. 8. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 9. Let the applicant “Raees” be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned. 10. It is made clear that after being released on bail the applicant shall report to the concerned nearest police station on the first day of every month and will also provide his mobile number and also cooperate with the trial and if the prosecution finds that the applicant is indulged in any similar activity, the prosecution is free to move an application for cancellation of bail. Rakesh Thapliyal, J.) 15.12.2025 Nahid 2025:UHC:11171