SHYAM NARAYAN PANDEY v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF REVENUE LKO. AND 11 OTHERS
WRIC/10372/2025 · 2025-11-10
Prashant Kumar, Shekhar B Saraf
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10372 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J.
HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) prays to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach appropriate forum/authority for carrying out necessary corrections as pointed out by learned counsel for the respondents.
3. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the same.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
5. However, it is provided that if an application for correction of the order dated October 5, 2006 passed by the Consolidation Officer, Naveen Gonda in Case No.438 is filed by the petitioner, the respondent authorities are directed to decide the said application within a period of four weeks from the date of filing of said application and if necessary correction is carried out, the respondent authorities are also directed to execute the consolidation order in accordance with law. November 10, 2025 Anupam S/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shesh Ram Mishra Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Shyam Narayan Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Revenue Lko. And 11 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANUPAM SINGH PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench