SHRAVAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME U.P. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/9725/2025 · 2025-11-03
Abdul Moin, Tej Pratap Tiwari
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172712 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172712 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 9725 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE TEJ PRATAP TIWARI, J. Heard. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner after arguing at some length states that as it is only a notice dated 01.07.2024 as issued by the respondent No.2 under Section 3 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act which has been challenged as such he intends to file reply to the same and prays that the competent authority be directed to consider and decide the reply in accordance with law under relevant rules by means of a reasoned and speaking order. To the aforesaid prayer, learned A.G.A. has no objection. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to submit reply to the notice dated 01.07.2024 before the competent authority within a period of a week along with a certified copy of this order. In case the reply is submitted, the competent authority shall proceed to consider the said reply in accordance with law under relevant rules and pass a reasoned and speaking order within a period of four weeks from the date of submission of the reply. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. November 3, 2025 prateek Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Chand Kaushik, Navneet Awasthi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Tej Pratap Tiwari,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Shravan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Home U.P. Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench