HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6545 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Chandra Kishore, the learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. Keeping in view the reliefs sought and the order proposed to be passed issuance of notice to the opposite parties is dispensed with. 3. By means of the instant petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India the petitioners have sought issuance of a direction to the learned Civil judge, Junior Division, Court No.18, Raebareli to decide Suit No.1158 of 2011: Mohd. Anees Khan Vs. Mohd. Vajid Khan and another expeditiously. 4. The opposite party has filed the aforesaid suit for perpetual injunction in the year 2011. Even an application for temporary injunction has not been disposed of till date, although no ex-parte order of adinterim injunction was passed in favour of the plaintiff-opposite party. Since the year 2023 the opposite party-plaintiff himself is failing to take steps for issuance of commission for local inspection of property in dispute. 5. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that mere pendency of the suit is creating unnecessary problems and disputes between the parties. 6. In these circumstances, the petition is allowed and a direction is issued to learned Civil judge, Junior Division, Court No.18, Raebareli to decide Suit No.1158 of 2011: Mohd. Anees Khan Vs. Mohd. Vajid Khan and another expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Chandra Kishore, Rajesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : Mohd. Vajid Khan And Another .....Petitioner(s) Mohd. Anees Khan .....Respondent(s) adjournment to any of the parties and by fixing dates at short intervals. November 12, 2025 Ram. A227 No. 6545 of 2025 2 (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench