Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172695 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. COOPERATIVE AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13183/2025 · 2025-11-13

Manish Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13183 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for the opposite parties. 2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to authority concerned for payment of commission to petitioner from the year 2021 till date in light of order dated 23.06.2021. 3. It has been submitted that petitioner is engaged on the post of Kurk Amin and is entitled for commission in terms of regulations applicable upon him. 4. Since considering petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, liberty is granted to petitioner to file fresh representation before opposite party no.2 i.e. Commissioner-cum-Registrar, Co-operative, U.P., Lucknow, - or any other competent authority who shall consider and decide the same within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of fresh representation along with a certified copy of this order. 5. With aforesaid direction(s), the petition is finally disposed of. November 13, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Daya Shankar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Anil Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Cooperative And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench