HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 29791 of 2016 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Case called out. 2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition. 3. Learned counsel for the State is present. 4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 6. Consigned to records. December 18, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ziauddin Khan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., I.M. Pandey, U.N. Mishra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Shamim Ahmad Khan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P.Thru.Its.Prin.Secy.Irrigation Deptt. Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench