M/S DRIZZLE CONSTRUCTIONS THRU. SAURABH KUMAR PANDEY and ANR. v. STATE OF U.P. and ANR.
A482/2629/2018 · 2025-10-31
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172679 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172679 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2629 of 2018 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. None appears on behalf of the applicant to press this petition.
2. Learned A.G.A. appearing on behalf of respondent State is present.
3. The petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
4. Interim order granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. October 31, 2025 Shukla Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Surendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Govt. Advocate (Rajeev Bharti,J.) M/S Drizzle Constructions Thru. Saurabh Kumar Pandey And Anr. .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And Anr. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench