HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 25518 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned standing counsel for respondent no. 1 and Sri Udit Chandra, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2. 2. Present petition has been filed seeking following principal relief:- "1). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 to increase the load of electricity connection no. 4209411000 of the petitioner from 1 KW to 4 KW or more as per electricity consumption forthwith." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that for redressal of his grievance, petitioner has filed representation dated 25.11.2024 before respondent No. 2, but till date no decision has been taken. Lastly, it is submitted that a direction may be issued to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid representation within a stipulated time, for which learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 has no objection. 4. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, the writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 25.11.2024 in accordance with law maximum within period of one month from the date of submission of certified copy of this order. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merits. It Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashish Jaiswal, Siddarth Jaiswal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Udit Chandra Mukund Lal Keshari .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) is upon respondent No. 2 to pass order after considering the relevant Rules as well as facts of the case. October 28, 2025 A.K.Srivastava WRIC No. 25518 of 2025 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad