TIRBHUWAN NATH PANDEY v. COMMISSIONER, FAIZABAD, AYODHYA DIVISION, FAIZABAD, AYODHYA, AND OTHERS
A227/6963/2025 · 2025-12-03
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172661 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 6963 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Prashant Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 1 - Commissioner, Faizabad (Ayodhya) Division, Faizabad (Ayodhya), to decide Recall Application filed in Appeal No. 108 of 1999 - Sitaram Vs. Kamta Prasad and Others, U/S 331(3) of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Faizabad (Ayodhya) Division, Faizabad (Ayodhya), considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 1 - Commissioner, Faizabad (Ayodhya) Division, Faizabad (Ayodhya), is directed to decide Recall Application filed in Appeal No. 108 of 1999 - Sitaram Vs. Kamta Prasad and Others, U/S 331(3) of U.P. Z.A. & L.R. Act, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 3, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Yadav, Pramod Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh (Alok Mathur,J.) Tirbhuwan Nath Pandey .....Petitioner(s) Commissioner, Faizabad, Ayodhya Division, Faizabad, Ayodhya, And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench