BABA BAL YOGI @ MANOJ SHUKLA @ LAV PANDIT @ MANEESH SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/4251/2025 · 2025-02-12
Vinod Diwakar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17265 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:20946 Court No. - 76 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 4251 of 2025 Applicant :- Baba Bal Yogi @ Manoj Shukla @ Lav Pandit @ Maneesh Shukla Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mukesh Chandra Gupta,Shubham Prakash Gupta Hon'ble Vinod Diwakar,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. The present application under Section 482 Cr.P.C., has been filed for quashing the Non Bailable Warrant dated 02.05.2023 issued by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Agra in Case No.22488 of 2018 titled State v. Baba Bal Yogi @ Manoj Shukla @ Lav Pandit @ Muneesh Shukla, arising out of Case Crime No. 189 of 2018, under Sections 147, 144, 341, 297, 323, 504, 506, 332, 353 IPC and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, registered at P.S. Hari Parwat, District Agra.
3. Learned counsel for applicant submits that impugned order is against the facts and law. The applicant had no knowledge about the proceedings initiated against him due to which they could not appear on the date fixed by the trial Court, hence, non-bailable warrant was issued against the applicant.
4. Per contra, learned A.G.A opposed the prayer.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, subject to deposit of Rs. 2,000/- by the applicant in favour of District Legal Services Authority concerned, it is directed that in case the applicant appears and moves appropriate application before the trial Court for recalling the impugned order, the same shall be
decided expeditiously in accordance with law. For a period of three weeks from today or till the applicant moves an application before the trial Court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant. Further, the Court shall not entertain the fictitious and repetitive personal exemption application, and if filed, the same shall be dismissed with reasonable costs.
6. With the aforesaid observation, the application is disposed of. Order Date :- 13.2.2025 Shafique Justice Vinod Diwakar Digitally signed by :- SAFIKUR RAHAMAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad