RAJ KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
/13320/2025 · 2025-11-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172641 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172641 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 13320 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel for opposite parties.
2. Petition has been filed challenging order dated 11.07.2025.
3. However, at the very outset, learned counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently, the original Termination Order dated 09.01.2020 could not be challenged and therefore seeks to file a fresh petition.
4. Considering the aforesaid submissions, petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting aforesaid liberty to file a fresh petition. November 19, 2025 lakshman Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Raj Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- LAKSHMANA KUMAR TAMMANA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench