Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172618 (ALL)

RAJESH KUMAR GAUTAM AND 13 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15784/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15784 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Standing Counsel. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioners have prayed for following relief as substantial relief: "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the Respondent authority to take into consideration the service period spent by the petitioners, while undergoing training before they were appointed as constables for calculating the of service and providing the training period increment and one additional increment after 19 years satisfactory service in pursuant to the Government Orders 2/12/200 and 21/072011 and also pay the arrears of it and revised the pay pension. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing to the Respondent to calculate the service period of the petitioners from the date of appointment and granting the training period increment and one additional increment after 19 years satisfactory service in pursuant to the Government Orders along with the arrears and revised the pay pension." 2. It appears from the records that the petitioner has already represented the matter to the respondent no. 3 on 08.10.2025. 3. Learned Standing Counsel submits that he has no objection in the event this petition stands disposed of with a direction to the respondent no. 3 to look into and consider the grievance of the petitioners and pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. In view of the above, this petition stands disposed of with a direction that Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suvash Ram Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Rajesh Kumar Gautam And 13 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) respondent no. 3 shall consider the grievance of the petitioners raised in their representation and decide the same within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 5. Needless to add the order to be passed by the competent authority, as directed herein above, shall be reasoned and speaking one. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour WRIA No. 15784 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad