MOHAMMAD NAIM URF NAMME v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/36875/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172611 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172611 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 36875 of 2025 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE DR. YOGENDRA KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. Heard Sri Abhishek Mayank, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Anand Bhaskar Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State respondents. The present petition has been filed seeking to assail an order dated 28.7.2025, passed by the respondent no.3, the Tehsildar, Tehsil Bansi, District Siddharth Nagar, in Case No. 2156 of 2023 (Computerized Case No.T202317630202156) [Report Lekhpal Vs. Naim], in proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006. It is not disputed that the order which is sought to be impugned, would be subject to a further statutory legal remedy, and in view thereof this Court is not inclined to entertain the present petition. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of leaving it open to the petitioner to take recourse to the appropriate statutory legal remedy. Office to return the certified copy of the order to the counsel for the petitioner, after retaining a photostat copy thereof. October 29, 2025 Arun K. Singh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhishek Mayank Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J.) Mohammad Naim Urf Namme .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad