DEVINDER BHARTI v. DR.PAWAN KOTWAL,SECY.PHE.AND ANR.
CPSW/63/2013 · 2025-02-10
Rajnesh Oswal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1726 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1726 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW No. 63/2013 in SWP No. 2600/2012
Devinder Bharti
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Ankush Manhas, Advocate.
vs
Dr. Pawan Kotwal, Secy. PHE and another .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 10.02.2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous with the efflux of time.
2. His statement is taken on record.
3. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the contempt proceedings are dropped and the instant contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 10.02.2025 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 60 Sahil Padha 2025.02.10 17:09 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document