HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 13093 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to decide the application Under Section 6C in Original Suit No.1852 of 2024 (Mahesh Kumar Vs. Ramesh Kumar & other) expeditiously pending before the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No.05, Prayagraj within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C. (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No.05, Prayagraj to consider and decide the aforementioned interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 30, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akhilesh Bharti, Kamlesh Prasad Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Mahesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Ramesh Kumar And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad