Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172576 (ALL)

SUNITA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/15886/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15886 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.P.Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel. 2. This writ petition appears to have been filed with a huge delay since the petitioner has claimed that she got retired on 19.12.2007 and now she is claiming arrears, gratuity and regular pension etc. 3. Still considering that petitioner is a lady and if she has worked and is entitled for aforesaid relief, she is at liberty to approach the concerned respondent who will look into the grievance of the petitioner and decide the same in accordance with law. 4. With the aforesaid observation, this writ petition is disposed of. October 29, 2025 SB Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajay Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Sunita Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP BHATTACHARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad