Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172573 (ALL)

GANESH SHANKAR SHUKLA @ CHANDAN SHUKLA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

CRLP/22628/2025 · 2025-10-27

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 22628 of 2025 Court No. - 42 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE ACHAL SACHDEV, J. 1. Heard Sri V. K. Ojha, Advocate holding brief of Sri Kanjaanan Pyare Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Manish Goyal, learned Additional Advocate General assisted by Sri Pankaj Saxena, learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. 2. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that as and when any parole or short-term bail application is considered of the convicted persons in Case Crime No.33 of 1997 then the Court may do so after hearing the parties. 3. Learned Additional Advocate General submits that as and when any order is passed in any case, it is so passed on the strength of the case and no general mandamus can be issued. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Advocate General for the State-respondents, we are of the view that every order, which is passed in a particular case, it is so passed after cosideirng the matter involved in that case and no general mandamus can therefore be issued. 5. In view of the above, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed. October 28, 2025 Zafar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kanjaanan Pyare Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Achal Sachdev,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Ganesh Shankar Shukla @ Chandan Shukla And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MOHAMMAD ZAFAR ANSARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad