Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15787 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Gaurav Kumar Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State.
2. The grievance of the writ petitioner is that pursuant to an exercise undertaken by the respondents, the writ petitioner was engaged on the post of Pump Operator-cum-Mechanic on 27.12.2017, however, his services stood discontinued on 29.11.2019. The claim of the writ petitioner is that there are various posts lying vacant, but the writ petitioner being fully eligible and qualified has not been accorded appointment.
3. Prayer in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to accord appointment to the writ petitioner on suitable post.
4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that in case, the writ petitioner approaches the second respondent/ Executive Engineer, Tubewell Division (Nalkoop Khand) Shahjahanpur, then his claim shall be considered.
5. Considering the submissions so made across the Bar, the writ petition stands disposed of directing the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with self attested copy of the writ petition and the certified copy of the order before Respondent no.2 by 07.11.2025, who on the said motion shall proceed to consider and decide the claim of the writ petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of the order. October 29, 2025 N.S.Rathour Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Alok Chaturvedi, Gaurav Kumar Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Anurag Verma .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NIPENDRA SINGH RATHOUR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad