Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34653 of 2025 Court No. - 68 HON'BLE ASHUTOSH SRIVASTAVA, J. Supplementary affidavit filed today by learned counsel for the applicant is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Manoj Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-Respondent and perused the record. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 127 of 2025, under Section 105 of the B.N.S., Police Station Kotwali, District Mainpuri.
Learned counsel for the applicant argued that the accused-applicant is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case crime number.
Learned counsel for the applicant further submits that the applicant is not named in the FIR and his name surfaced during the course of investigation. He further submits that nothing incriminating material has been recovered from the possession of the applicant. He submits that in the present case all the witnesses are relatives of the informant and there is no independent witness of the alleged incident. He submits that in the present case, charge- sheet has been filed and the applicant is not required any custodial interrogation. He submits that no specific role and motive has been assigned to the applicant in the present case. The applicant is languishing in jail since
01.03.2025. The applicant has criminal antecedents of two other cases which has been explained in the affidavit filed in support of the bail application. He further submits that there is no likelihood of his fleeing from course of justice or tampering with evidence in case of release on bail. Hence, the bail has been prayed for. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pradyumn Kumar, Rakesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Simran Preet Singh .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
Learned counsel for the AGA has vehemently opposed, but could not dispute the aforesaid fact raised by learned counsel for the applicant. Considering all those facts and circumstances, the nature of accusations, severity of the punishment in the case of conviction and nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tampering with the witness and prima- facie case, but without commenting on merit of case, a case for bail is made out. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the accused-applicant, Simran Preet Singh, involved in above mentioned case crime number be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and two reliable sureties each, in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant will not tamper with the evidence.
2. The applicant will not indulge in any criminal activity.
3. The applicant will not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses and co-operate in the trial.
4. The applicant will appear regularly on each and every date fixed by the trial court, unless his personal appearance is exempted through counsel by the court concerned. In the event of breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the court below will be at liberty to proceed to cancel his bail. October 29, 2025 pks BAIL No. 34653 of 2025 2 (Ashutosh Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- PAWAN KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad