HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12869 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: " It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to allow the petition and further be pleased to direct the Court of Additional Small Causes Court, Varanasi to decide the application paper No. 86C filed in Original Suit No. 1163 of 1997, Dhune Versus Mukhram and others pending before it since 10.5.2022. And/or pass such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the circumstances of the case, Otherwise petitioners/applicants shall suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that an application (Paper No. 86 C) is pending since 2022 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Additional Small Causes Court, Varanasi to consider and decide the aforementioned application (86C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the opposite parties, giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. October 29, 2025 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Deo Dayal, Nand Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Phool Chand Yadav And 2 Others .....Petitioner(s) Dhune And 33 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad