Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17255 (ALL)

KRITIK KESARWANI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/3925/2025 · 2025-03-17

Anjani Kumar Mishra, Jayant Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:38200-DB Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 3925 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kritik Kesarwani Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Akash Kumar Pathak,Namit Srivastava,Vishesh Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Madan Mohan Srivastava Hon'ble Anjani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Jayant Banerji,J. 1. Heard. 2. The petitioner, aggrieved by an order of mutation, is stated to have filed an objection before the same authority. The petition seeks a direction for consideration of this objection. 3. On a query by the Court, Counsel for petitioner admits that he has the remedy of filing an appeal against the mutation order whereby he is aggrieved. 4. The petition, under the circumstances, is dismissed, leaving it open to the petitioner to avail such remedy as may be available to him under law for the redressal of his grievances. Order Date :- 18.3.2025 Irshad Digitally signed by :- IRSHAD AHMAD SIDDIQUI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad