Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172525 (ALL)

CHANDRAKANT SHUKLA v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA529/4006/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 529 BNSS No. - 4006 of 2025 Court No. - 87 HON'BLE ANIL KUMAR-X, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that he is complainant in Complaint Case No. 1655 of 2021 (Chandrakant Shukla Versus Sandeep Kumar Mishra), under Section 138 of N.I. Act, at Police Station Gyanpur, District Bhadohi which is pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhadohi, Gyanpur. Learned counsel, therefore, prays that a direction be issued to the learned Magistrate to decide the said case as expeditiously as as possible. 3. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicant, the court below concerned is directed to decide the aforesaid case as expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, provided there is no legal impediment. 4. The application under Section 529 B.N.S.S. is disposed of accordingly. October 29, 2025 Ujjawal Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rahul Kumar Tripathi, Richa Tripathi, Shishir Kumar Dwivedi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Anil Kumar-X,J.) Chandrakant Shukla .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- UJJAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad