Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 172521 (ALL)

NEELAM GANGWAR v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND 5 OTHERS

WRIA/15844/2025 · 2025-10-28

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15844 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri U.S. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State-respondents. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that though the writ petitioner along with sixth respondent and others applied for the recruitment on the post of Anganbari Karkatri pursuant to the advertisement dated 15.03.2024 for Block Nababganj, District Bareilly and the respondent no. 6 was selected, however, a candidature has been cancelled and the writ petitioner claims to be at serial no. 2. 3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to offer appointment to the writ petitioner and consequent joining. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the grievance shall be considered at the first instance by the District Program Officer, Bareilly, respondent no. 4. 5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same. 6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the fourth respondent, who shall on the receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : U.S. Verma, Vipin Gangwar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Neelam Gangwar .....Petitioner(s) State Of Uttar Pradesh And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) 7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case. 8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 29, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15844 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad