BUNTS SANGHA BANGALORE v. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIEITES
WP/38322/2017 · 2025-01-24
Jyoti Mulimani
Civil Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17252 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17252 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3238 WP No. 38322 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 38322 OF 2017 (GM-KSR) BETWEEN:
BUNTS SANGHA, BANGALORE, REGD. OFFICE AT NO.324, BUNTS SANGHA COMPLEX, CHORD ROAD, VIAJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040. REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT/SECRETARY. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAYANTH RANGANNA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT])
AND:
1. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR OF SOCIEITES, OFF: AT 4TH ZONE, BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT, 8TH FLOOR, KARNATAKA HOUSING BOARD COMPLEX, CAUVERY BHAVANA, K.G.ROAD, BANGALORE-560 009. 2. SRI AMARNATH SHETTY S/O M.R.SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, NO.308, 14TH A CROSS, 17TH MAIN, SECTOR-IV, H.S.R.LAYOUT, BANGALORE-560 102. 3. SRI DEEPAK SHETTY S/O HIMAKARA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/AT 'SUDHIKSHA' NO.18, 10TH CROSS, GARDEN VILLAS, NEAR NAGARABHAVI CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 072. Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3238 WP No. 38322 of 2017
4. SRI VIJAYA J.SHETTY HALADI S/O K.JAGANNATH SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, NO.16, JJ PARADISE-402, 1ST MAIN, 3RD PHASE, VINAYAKA LAYOUT, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 040. 5. SRI C.A.VIJAYA SHETTY S/O MANJAYYA SHETTY.M, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, BVS & CO., CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT, R/AT NO.371, 1ST FLOOR, ABOVE BARISTA, 8TH MAIN ROAD, SADASHIVANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 080. 6. SRI SUDHAKAR SHETTY.S S/O LATE U.MAHABALA SHETTY, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/AT NO.120, 'NADISHREE', 10TH CROSS, II STAGE, NGEF LAYOUT, NAGARABHAVI, BANGALORE-560 072. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR., AGA FOR R1;
R3, 5 & 6-ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
When the case is called, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and called out, the advocate must be present. The absence may affect the case. - 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:3238 WP No. 38322 of 2017
Sri.Mahantesh Shettar., AGA for respondent No.1 has appeared in person. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the petition was listed on 21.01.2025, on that day, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, for appearance of counsel for the petitioner, it was ordered to be listed on 24.01.2025. The petition is listed today. As already noted above, when the case is called, the petitioner is not represented.
It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 3