MD. FARHAN ANSARI ALIAS MD. FARHAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./5794/2025 · 2025-07-14
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17252 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 17252 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:19078] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.5794 of 2025
------ Md. Farhan Ansari @ Md. Farhan, aged about 28 years, son of Md. Tabkul Hasan, resident of Village- Manipur, Nubranga, P.S.- Muffasil, P.O. and District- Gaya (Bihar)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... …. Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Priyanka Agrawal, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Shashi Kr. Verma, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 14-07-2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Kuru P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 registered under Section 309 (4) of the B.N.S., 2023.
Learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Let the same be kept in the record.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed robbery of Rs.60,000/- and one mobile phone. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-03 of the Supplementary Affidavit filed today in this case, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that charge- sheet has already been submitted in this case. It is also submitted that the petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 11.03.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Lohardaga in connection with Kuru P.S. Case No.30 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/