MAHENDRA PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/15847/2025 · 2025-10-28
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 172516 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15847 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J.
1. Heard Sri Girish Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Manish Kumar, learned Standing Counsel, who appears for State- respondents.
2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner happens to be Head Jail Warden District Jail Kashganj and he seeks his transfer to District Bareilly on the premise that as per the Government orders invogue, he can be transferred to place of his choice within a period of two years of retirement.
3. Prayer in the present petition is for a direction to the respondents to consider his claim.
4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that the claim of the writ petitioner is to be considered at the first instance by the second respondent, Director General of Police (Jail), U.P. at Lucknow.
5. To such a submission, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection and he gracefully accepts the same.
6. Considering the submissions of the rival parties as well as stand taken by them, the writ petition is being disposed off granting liberty to the writ petitioner to prefer a comprehensive representation along with the self- attested copy of the writ petition before the second respondent, who shall on the receipt of the same by 07.11.2025, proceed to decide the claim of the petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a period of two months from the date of presentation of the certified copy of the order. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Girish Kumar Mishra, Hari Om Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Mahendra Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Needless to point out that the writ petition has been decided without seeking any response from the respondents. Thus, passing of this order may not be construed to an expression that this Court has gone into the merits of the case.
8. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed off. October 29, 2025 A. Prajapati WRIA No. 15847 of 2025 2 (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH KUMAR PRAJAPATI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad