Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17251 (UTT)

IRSHAD v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

C482/2718/2019 · 2025-12-01

Ashish Naithani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Dat e Of f ice Not es, r epor t s, or ders or pr oceedin gs or dir ect ion s an d Regist r ar’s or der w it h Sign at u r es COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:10676 IA No.12092/ 2025 (Compounding Application) with C482 No.2718 of 2019 Hon ’ble Ash ish Nait h an i, J. Ms. Unnati Pant, learned counsel for the Applicants. 2. Mr. Vijay Khanduri, learned Brief Holder, for the State of Uttarakhand/1. 3. Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel for the private Respondent No.2. 4. In the present Application filed under Section 482 of the CrPC, the Applicants have put a challenge to the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.822 of 2019 (Case Crime No.288 of 2018) “State Vs. Parveen and others”, under Sections 323, 498-A, 504 and 506 of IPC, P.S. Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, which is pending before the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar. 5. Ever since its inception since 05.12.2019, matter has been listed for one cause or the other. Now, the parties are present before this Court in person for the disposal of the compounding application paper no.131, wherein, parties have annexed their signatures and duly identified by the learned counsel and also supported with an affidavit. 6. After interacting with the parties, especially the Respondent No.2 – Salma, who is present before this Court, states that it has been seven years ever since she is being living at her parental house; she has three daughters who are staying with the husband/Applicant No.1 and the matter has been reconciled between them. They wish to stay together as wife and husband for good; she has no issue with her mother-in-law i.e. Applicant No.2 Praveen. 7. Parties are present in person before this Court along with their learned counsel, who has been duly identified by the learned counsel, and submits that they have settled their dispute amicably. 8. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 9. In view of the principle of law laid down by Hon'ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 as well as in Transfer Petition (Criminal) No. 115 of 2012 (Dimpey Gujral vs. Union Territory of Chandigarh) decided on 06.12.2012, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interested to restore peace and harmony between them. 10. In view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.822 of 2019 (Case Crime No.288 of 2018) “State Vs. Parveen and others”, under Sections 323, 498-A, 504 and 506 of IPC, P.S. Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, which is pending before the court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar, are hereby quashed. 11. The Criminal Miscellaneous Application, filed under 482 of CrPC, is disposed of accordingly. ( Ash ish Nait h an i, J.) 0 1 .1 2 .2 0 2 5 Nitesh/