Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 17251 (KAR)

SRI J MURALI v. SRI LAKSHMI MAHILA SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA

WP/4509/2020 · 2025-01-10

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1034 WP No. 4509 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 4509 OF 2020 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: SRI. J.MURALI S/O JANARDHAN, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/AT NO.4/12, 3RD MAIN ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560 010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VACHAN.H.U., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. KAVITHA.D., ADVOCATE) AND: SRI LAKSHMI MAHILA SAHAKARA BANK NIYAMITHA, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER, "LAKSHMI SADHANA", NO.3, 4, EAST ANJANEYA TEMPLE STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. R.ASHOK KUMAR., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1034 WP No. 4509 of 2020 ORAL ORDER Sri.Vachan.H.U., counsel on behalf of Smt.Kavitha.D., for the petitioner has appeared in person. Counsel submits that the Writ Petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous. When queried, counsel Sri.Vachan.H.U., submits that a conscious decision is taken by the advocate on record and the petitioner about infructuous of the petition and if an order is passed, they shall not seek for recalling the same or file review petition. The oral submission made by counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. The Writ Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 3 Sl No.: 11